Skip to content
trending
// AI model ranking

AI model ranking

Which AI models are the smartest, cheapest and fastest today? This ranking updates itself - we pull data from Megaherc, which fetches results from the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index twice daily. Click a column header to sort.

as of: 12.11.2026 - data from Megaherc (Artificial Analysis API v2)
# Model Lab Intelligence Price /1M ($) Speed Context
1 Claude Fable 5.2 (max) Anthropic Anthropic 65 16 93 1M
2 Claude Fable 5.2 (xhigh) Anthropic Anthropic 62 16 85 1M
3 Claude Fable 5.2 (high) Anthropic Anthropic 62 16 80 1M
4 Gemini 4 Carbon (high) Google Google 60 8 100 1M
5 Claude Opus 5.5 (max) Anthropic Anthropic 59 8 96 1M
6 Gemini 4 Carbon (medium) Google Google 58 8 94 1M
7 Claude Opus 5.5 (xhigh) Anthropic Anthropic 57 8 81 1M
8 GPT-6 Astra (max) OpenAI OpenAI 57 20 46 1.05M
9 Claude Fable 5.2 (medium) Anthropic Anthropic 56 16 80 1M
10 GPT-6 Astra (xhigh) OpenAI OpenAI 55 20 52 1.05M
11 GPT-6 Astra (high) OpenAI OpenAI 55 20 44 1.05M
12 GPT-6.1 Sol (max) OpenAI OpenAI 55 4 61 -
13 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) Anthropic Anthropic 55 4 130 1M
14 Gemini 4 Carbon (low) Google Google 54 8 92 1M
15 Claude Fable 5.2 (low) Anthropic Anthropic 54 16 77 1M
16 GPT-6.1 Sol (xhigh) OpenAI OpenAI 53 4 64 -
17 Claude Opus 5.5 (high) Anthropic Anthropic 52 8 81 1M
18 GPT-6 Astra (medium) OpenAI OpenAI 52 20 42 1.05M
19 GPT-6.1 Terra (max) OpenAI OpenAI 51 2 87 -
20 Gemini 4 Argon (high) Google Google 50 8 92 1M
21 GPT-6.1 Sol (high) OpenAI OpenAI 50 4 56 -
22 Claude Fable 5.1 (xhigh) Anthropic Anthropic 50 20 61 1M
23 Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xhigh) Anthropic Anthropic 50 4 105 1M
24 Claude Fable 5.1 (max) Anthropic Anthropic 49 20 67 1M
25 Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) Anthropic Anthropic 48 8 79 1M

Scroll the table sideways to see speed and context.

Quick takeaways

Intelligence leader Claude Fable 5.2 (max)

Intelligence Index 65- highest in the ranking.

Best price for quality GPT-6.1 Terra (max)

USD only2 per 1M tokens at index 51.

Fastest Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)

130 tokens per second - highest throughput.

Conclusions are calculated automatically from the same data you see in the table, nothing is added manually.

How to read the AI model ranking

The ranking organizes language models along four axes that in practice determine your choice of tool. Intelligence is the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, a composite score from multiple benchmarks (reasoning, code, math, knowledge), reduced to a single number: the higher, the better. It's a good starting point, but not an oracle, because a model with a lower index can win at a specific, narrow task.

Price per 1M tokens tells you how much you'll pay per million tokens processed (that's roughly 700 thousand words). At large scale, the difference between a model at three dollars versus twenty can impact your entire project budget more than a few index points. Speed (tokens per second) and time to first token matter everywhere a user waits for a live response: in chat, in a voice assistant, in a code editor. Context is how much text the model accepts at once; a large window lets you drop in entire documentation or a long file without splitting it into chunks.

There's no single "best" model, only the best for your task and budget. For mass, cheap text processing you'll choose differently than for difficult reasoning or code generation, and something else again if you care about running the model on your own hardware (the open-weights column). That's why instead of memorizing one name, it's worth returning to a fresh comparison, because positions change with every new release.

Data: Megaherc/ Artificial Analysis. Full ranking with charts and change history: megaherc.pl.

// site map
Quantslant in numbers 1,429posts in archive25news from the last 7 days18video models in the observatory
🎬 AI Video Benchmarks: Higgsfield DoP vs OpenAI Sora • Higgsfield vs Runway Gen-3 • AI Video Credit Calculator
× ‹ enlarge ›