Skip to content
trending

AI Tools

DeepSeek, GLM, Kimi and Qwen: Free AI or Cheap API?

A comparison of free AI chat plans and API costs for DeepSeek, GLM, Kimi and Qwen, based on usage logs and model tests from October 24, 2026.

By 4 min read

👁 118 reads

Before paying $20 for a subscription, consider two cheaper options: free AI chat plans and low-cost model APIs. Using my usage logs from October 24, 2026, I calculated the cost of a task on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, GLM-5.3, Kimi K3.1 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max, then compared the results with the free versions of ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek.

At a glance (as of October 24, 2026)

  • For $1.27 in API usage, you can get about 1,180 typical short tasks on DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, about 800 on GLM-5.3 and about 170 on Kimi K3.1 Pro.
  • Quality: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scored 94.8% in my test, compared with 98.7% for Claude Opus 5.5.
  • DeepSeek’s free chat uses the same V4.1-Flash-1017 model, so you don’t need the API for a conversation.
  • Free plans from major providers offer weaker models: ChatGPT Free includes GPT-5.6 Luna, while Gemini without a subscription mainly uses Flash-Lite.

What you get with free AI plans

Free plan Model Provider’s stated limit Notes
ChatGPT Free GPT-5.6 Luna “Unlimited” standard chats, subject to abuse safeguards 27,000-token context; limited files, images and voice
Claude Free Sonnet and Haiku Five-hour session; no message count specified No Opus or Claude Code; up to five projects
Gemini without a subscription Auto mode, mainly Flash-Lite Standard limit, refreshed every five hours More difficult prompts may be routed to Flash or Pro
DeepSeek V4.1-Flash-1017 No published limits No paid chat plan
Kimi Adagio Kimi Message count not specified Paid plans start at $19
Mistral Free Mistral models “Limited messages and searches” Pro offers up to six times more messages

I’ve covered the free versions in more detail in separate guides: ChatGPT for free, Gemini for free after the October 9 changes and Claude Haiku 5.5 for free.

How much does a task cost on low-cost models?

These figures come from my test across 10 languages on October 24, 2026, using OpenRouter with medium reasoning; Qwen and GLM were tested in seven languages. Prices are from official price lists on the same date. For DeepSeek, I use peak-hour rates ($0.30 / $1.20); off-peak rates, including weekends, are half as much.

Model (input/output USD per 1 million tokens) Typical short task Document of about 30,000 tokens Tasks for $1.27
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ($0.30 / $1.20) about $0.00107 about $0.00866 about 1,180
GLM-5.3 ($1.40 / $4.40) about $0.00157 about $0.03856 about 806
Gemini 4 Argon ($2 / $10) about $0.00429 about $0.05387 about 297
Kimi K3.1 Pro ($2 / $10) about $0.00732 about $0.06149 about 174
Qwen3.8 Max ($2 / $6) about $0.00820 about $0.05471 about 155

In practical terms, $1.27 divided by the $0.0011 cost of a DeepSeek task comes to about 1,180 tasks. A $20 plan would only be worth it over DeepSeek at 620 tasks a day, or over GLM-5.3 at 422 tasks a day.

$1.27 / $0.00108 = 1,180 tasks

What about quality?

In my test, each model completed 12 tasks in each of 10 languages. Responses were scored from 0 to 6 against a reference, with some scoring automated and some done by two AI judges. Average results were: Claude Opus 5.5, 98.7%; GPT-6 Astra, 97.8%; Qwen3.8 Max, 95.2%; DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, 94.8%; Gemini 4 Argon, 93.6%; GLM-5.3, 87.3%; and Kimi K3.1 Pro, 86.5%. Kimi lost points mainly because eight responses were off-topic on the standard endpoint, as discussed in the K3.1 Pro test.

The practical takeaway: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash delivers about 96% of Opus’s quality for about 6% of the price on short tasks. That’s enough for letters, summaries, translations and data extraction. For difficult writing where style and nuance matter, a four-point difference can be noticeable.

When to use free chat and when to use a low-cost API

  • Free DeepSeek chat: Conversations and one-off questions. It uses the same model as the API, with no bill.
  • Low-cost API: Repetitive automated tasks, hundreds of product descriptions, extracting data to JSON, or workflows in n8n or your own script. Free chat isn’t suited to this.
  • Free ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini: Quick questions in a mobile app, but with weaker models and usage limits.
  • Paid plan: Consider one when you need the best model every day, long conversations or a coding agent.

I cover DeepSeek API pricing in my DeepSeek API pricing guide, and Kimi in Kimi K3.1 Pro API pricing and Kimi pricing.

Try Kimi at kimi.com

This is my Kimi referral link. Kimi says both parties receive a bonus when you buy a membership, at no extra cost to you.

For break-even comparisons across seven models and plans from $8 to $200, see my guide to subscriptions versus APIs.

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek free?

The chat at chat.deepseek.com and the app have no paid plan and use DeepSeek V4.1-Flash-1017. Only the API is paid, with charges based on tokens.

Which model offers the most for the least?

Of the models tested, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: about $0.00107 per typical short task and 94.8% in my test.

Does free ChatGPT include GPT-6?

According to OpenAI’s help information, Free and Go users get GPT-5.6 Luna. GPT-6 is available on plans from Plus upward.

Is the Gemini API free?

Some models, including Gemini 3.8 Flash, have a free tier, but Google uses content from that tier to improve its services. Gemini 4 Argon is available only on the paid tier.

Google · Your sourcesQuantslant higher in your Google - one clickAdd to preferred sources →

Sources and date checked

Kinetyra

// read next

More on this from QUANTSLANT

Piotr Olszewski

Editor and publisher · Quantslant

I edit and publish Quantslant. AI tools help with research, drafts and translation; choosing topics, running the tests, checking facts and the decision to publish are mine, and so is the responsibility for what appears here.

read nextguidesAI for Students With Learning Needs: Adapted Texts and TasksUse AI to create clearer texts, step-by-step instructions and audio versions for students with learning needs - without sharing their personal or health data.

Most read

  1. 1Best AI Video Generator Apps for Your Phone (2026)
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 Motion Graphics: 60s Showreel from One Prompt
  3. 3Wan 2.2 on RTX 4090: timings, VRAM and four test clips
// site map

This page in other languages4

Quantslant in numbers 1,427posts in archive26news from the last 7 days18video models in the observatory
🎬 AI Video Benchmarks: Higgsfield DoP vs OpenAI Sora • Higgsfield vs Runway Gen-3 • AI Video Credit Calculator
× ‹ enlarge ›