Skip to content
trending

Benchmarks

HiDream-O1-Video vs MiniMax H3 Max vs Vidu Q4 vs Seedance 2.0

Elo ratings, cost per minute, clip length, resolution, and availability. A detailed comparison of HiDream-O1-Video, MiniMax H3 Max, Vidu Q4, and Seedance 2.0.

By 5 min read

👁 117 reads

HiDream-O1-Video-1.0, Vidu Q4 Preview, Seedance 2.0, and MiniMax H3 Max are separated by only 20 Elo points (1175-1195) on the Artificial Analysis image-to-video leaderboard. Outside of H3 Max, these score gaps fall within the statistical margin of error. As a result, your choice comes down to pricing, clip length, generation modes, and access methods. HiDream is inexpensive ($5.80 per minute), but it features the narrowest API and lacks third-party aggregator support. Full model profile: HiDream-O1-Video.

Verdict in Brief (October 11, 2026)

  • Best value for money: MiniMax H3 Max - 1st place (1195) and the lowest price at $4.80 per minute.
  • Highest resolution and reference control: Vidu Q4 Preview - up to 4K, up to 15 reference images, $5.04 per minute.
  • Broadest availability and text-to-video: Seedance 2.0 - BytePlus, OpenRouter, fal.ai, but the most expensive ($9.07).
  • HiDream-O1-Video: image-to-video only via HiDream’s own API; best suited for physics-heavy scenes and model-determined clip durations.

Rankings: Who Actually Comes Out Ahead

Model I2V Rank Elo 95% CI Comparisons T2V Rank
MiniMax H3 Max 1 1195 1186-1204 5894 5 (1130)
Vidu Q4 Preview 3 1179 1169-1189 5543 none
Gemini Omni Flash 4 1178 1171-1185 12 327 8 (version 1.1, 1113)
Seedance 2.0 720p 5 1176 1169-1183 15 721 7 (1116)
HiDream-O1-Video-1.0 6 1175 1165-1185 3231 none

Data: Artificial Analysis, image-to-video and text-to-video, retrieved October 11, 2026, intervals rounded. Holding 2nd place in I2V is MiniMax H3 (1181), which I cover below regarding open weights.

Elo Rating on the Image-to-Video Leaderboard (AA, Oct 11, 2026)
MiniMax H3 Max1195
Vidu Q4 Preview1179
Gemini Omni Flash1178
Seedance 2.0 720p1176
HiDream-O1-Video1175

Scale starts at 1000 points (bar = (Elo - 1000) / 2 percent). How to interpret this:

  • Vidu Q4, Gemini, Seedance 2.0, and HiDream are tied. Their confidence intervals overlap, with merely 4 points separating 3rd and 6th place.
  • H3 Max is clearly ahead. Its lower bound (1186) sits above the upper bounds of HiDream (1185) and Seedance (1183). With Vidu Q4, the intervals barely touch.
  • HiDream has the fewest matchups (3231), making its ranking the least certain in either direction.

Cost Per Minute of Video

Model USD per Minute (AA) 10s Clip (Calculated) Official Price List
MiniMax H3 Max 4.80 $0.80 yes (via providers)
Vidu Q4 Preview 5.04 $0.84 yes (Vidu credits)
HiDream-O1-Video 5.80 $0.97 not found
Gemini Omni Flash 6.00 $1.00 not verified
Seedance 2.0 720p 9.07 $1.51 yes (tokens)
Price per Minute of Video via Artificial Analysis (USD, Oct 11, 2026)
MiniMax H3 Max4.80
Vidu Q4 Preview5.04
HiDream-O1-Video5.80
Gemini Omni Flash6.00
Seedance 2.0 720p9.07

Scale: 100% = $9.07. Prices reflect the Artificial Analysis benchmark table (each model in its default setup). The 10-second clip figure is my own calculation. Keep in mind that for Vidu Q4, AA reported $7.20 on October 8, adjusting it to $5.04 on October 11. For HiDream, $5.80 is the only figure available; HiDream does not publish an official price list. For more on billing structures (seconds, credits, tokens), see my breakdown on how much a second of AI video costs.

Side-by-Side Specifications

Feature HiDream-O1-Video MiniMax H3 Max Vidu Q4 Preview Seedance 2.0
Text-to-video not in API (announced) yes no yes
API inputs 1 image + prompt text, first and last frame 1 image or up to 15 references + 3 audio voices text, images, video, audio
Duration model-chosen or 10s (announced: 5-20s) 5-15s 3-16s 4-15s
Resolution no parameter (announced: 1080p) 480p, 768p, 1080p 540p-4K 480p-4K
Audio announced, undocumented in API yes (fal.ai) yes, default yes
Aggregators none fal.ai, OpenRouter, reAPI fal.ai, WaveSpeedAI, ComfyUI BytePlus, OpenRouter, fal.ai, reAPI
Open weights no (only O1-Image is open) no (weights available for H3, not Max) no no

Sources: HiDream - HiHarness documentation (October 11, 2026); remaining models - data from my guides covering H3 Max, Vidu Q4, and Seedance (as of October 8, 2026); OpenRouter - video model list as of October 11, 2026 (includes minimax/hailuo-3-max and bytedance/seedance-2.0, but lacks Vidu and HiDream). Gemini Omni Flash is omitted from this table; see the Gemini Omni Flash guide for its technical specs.

Open Weights: Only H3, With Major Caveats

In the AA leaderboard, MiniMax H3 (not H3 Max) is the only model in this tier offering a link to open weights. On its model card (retrieved October 11, 2026), only the H3-Base component is available (33B parameters) under the MiniMax H3 Community License, which requires an access form. The reference deployment requires 4 GPUs, while the 2K upscaler still relies on their API. This is not a model you can run on a typical home desktop.

Dealat Kinetyra
Synthesia Starter - 12 Months
$79 instead of $216 -63%
See the deal →

HiDream does not release weights for O1-Video. The MIT-licensed release is HiDream-O1-Image, an image generation model that works well for creating starting frames. You can read more about self-hosted alternatives in the local AI guide.

Global Availability

  • MiniMax H3 Max and Seedance 2.0 - easiest to access via OpenRouter or fal.ai: a single account, standard card billing, and multi-model routing.
  • Vidu Q4 - vidu.com, the Vidu API, and fal.ai. It is not listed on OpenRouter.
  • HiDream-O1-Video - strictly available through vivago.ai and the HiHarness API. It remains unclear whether vivago has fully deployed the model in R1 Studio: a post from September 30 states “now available,” while an announcement from October 9 refers to an “upcoming update.” I analyzed this in HiDream’s API is limited to image-to-video.

Which Model Should You Choose?

  • MiniMax H3 Max - when you want the highest leaderboard position at the lowest price per minute, along with text-to-video capability. The most practical choice for most projects.
  • Vidu Q4 Preview - when generating recurring characters and matching voiceovers, or when you require 4K output and up to 15 reference inputs. The trade-off: an initial image is always required.
  • Seedance 2.0 - when you prefer unified billing through an aggregator like OpenRouter or fal.ai and need every possible input modality. The trade-off: the highest per-minute cost in this tier.
  • HiDream-O1-Video - when animating pre-rendered scenes governed by physics (bounces, collisions, surface dynamics) and managing a separate platform account is not an issue. The trade-off: limited API options, unlisted pricing, and no manual control over resolution or audio.
  • Gemini Omni Flash - when your workflow is tied directly to the Google ecosystem; its image-to-video performance benchmarks on par with HiDream.

If your primary requirement is text-to-video, consider looking into Wan 3.0, which holds 1st place in T2V. For a comprehensive market breakdown, see my guide to AI video generators.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is HiDream-O1-Video better than Vidu Q4?

The leaderboard cannot definitively separate them: scores of 1175 vs. 1179 with overlapping confidence intervals indicate a statistical tie. Vidu Q4 is cheaper ($5.04 vs. $5.80 per minute on AA) and provides significantly more configuration options.

Which model is the cheapest?

MiniMax H3 Max - priced at $4.80 per minute on Artificial Analysis (October 11, 2026). HiDream ranks third in cost.

Which one offers open weights?

Only MiniMax H3 (the base model, not H3 Max), and only under an approved community license. HiDream has open-sourced only its O1-Image generation model.

Can I run these via OpenRouter?

You can use MiniMax H3 Max and Seedance 2.0 (as of the October 11, 2026 catalog). HiDream and Vidu Q4 are currently unavailable there.

Google · Your sourcesQuantslant higher in your Google - one clickAdd to preferred sources →

Sources and Verification Date

// read next

More on this from QUANTSLANT

Piotr Olszewski

Editor and publisher · Quantslant

I edit and publish Quantslant. AI tools help with research, drafts and translation; choosing topics, running the tests, checking facts and the decision to publish are mine, and so is the responsibility for what appears here.

read nextnewsVidu Q4 Preview Debuts at No. 3 on AI Video LeaderboardVidu Q4 Preview debuted at #3 on the Artificial Analysis image-to-video leaderboard with 1,179 Elo points. Pricing starts at $7.20/min for 1080p.

Most read

  1. 1Best AI Video Generator Apps for Your Phone (2026)
  2. 2Claude Opus 5.5 Motion Graphics: 60s Showreel from One Prompt
  3. 3Wan 2.2 on RTX 4090: timings, VRAM and four test clips
// site map

This page in other languages6

Quantslant in numbers 1,427posts in archive26news from the last 7 days18video models in the observatory
🎬 AI Video Benchmarks: Higgsfield DoP vs OpenAI Sora • Higgsfield vs Runway Gen-3 • AI Video Credit Calculator
× ‹ enlarge ›